Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Do our politicians suffer from Attention Deficit Disorder?

Attention Deficit Disorder has been a byword in US schools - any child not paying attention in school or is hyper active is immediately branded as having ADD. As if staying put in a small class was not enough ADD now empowers adults to pop pills into kids without the usual diatribe that follows a chemical experience. But ADD has cast its net wide and now grown ups in the US are also being diagnosed with ADD.

However keeping the Indian politician in mind I have tried to compare the characteristics of our politicians with those required for a child to be diagnosed with ADD.

In 1987 the American Psychiatric Association provided a list of characteristics that a child must display for 6 months or more, at least eight of the following characteristics prior to the age of 7 for the child to be diagnosed with ADD:

1. Fidgets, squirms or seem restless,

2. Has difficulty remaining seated,

3. Is easily distracted, has difficulty awaiting turn,

4. Blurts out answers, has difficulty following instructions,

5. Has difficulty sustaining attention,

6. Shifts from one uncompleted task to another,

7. Has difficulty playing quietly, talks excessively,

8. Interrupts or intrudes on others.

9. Does not seem to listen.

10. Often loses things necessary for tasks.

11. Frequently engages in dangerous actions.

And from these characteristics I can very safely argue that our politicians suffer from ADD

  1. Fidgets, squirms or seems restless

This is noticeable especially before an election or when there is a reshuffling of cabinet seats. Politicians become restless and search for better opportunities else where.

  1. Has difficulty remaining seated

Closely observed during parliamentary sessions when politicians keep getting up for incomprehensible reasons

  1. Is easily distracted, has difficulty awaiting turn

A politician is easily distracted from his credo of ‘service to the electorate’ by the sudden appearance of money and personal profit. Also the politician’s use of revolving lights, security guards, and sirens indicates difficulty awaiting turn.

d. Blurts out answers, has difficulty following instructions

Seen most recently in the case of Arjun Singh, Jaswant Singh and George Fernandes.

  1. Has difficulty sustaining attention

The researcher hasn’t yet found this characteristic in politicians. The researcher proposes a completely opposite characteristic – that of being able to sustain attention. For example the BJP still holds the attention of people with its Ram Card, the Congress speaks about Aam Admi, both play the religious and caste card. Infact all politicians plays these cards very well.

  1. Shifts from one uncompleted task to another

Also explained as having a finger in more than one pie. Seen with the number of criminal cases these people have. Before they can be proved innocent/guilty in one case (and thus can pay for their crimes) they move on to another crime.

  1. Has difficulty playing quietly, talks excessively

Blame game – the favourite sport of politicians happens in public and is never quite, it involves media spectacles and a lot of verbosity.

  1. Interrupts or intrudes on others.

This characteristic is seen once again in Parliament where free speech implies shouting and other dignified political manners.

  1. Does not seem to listen.

This should be elaborated to ‘does not seem to listen to constituency’. The condition of roads, services etc make a strong argument for this characteristic.

  1. Often looses things necessary for tasks.

Memory – such an important thing for a politician is quite often lost. Seen most recently in the L K Advani cover up of his role in Kandahar.

  1. Frequently engages in dangerous actions.

Speeches that generate hatred and social disharmony made by politicians, attempts to hand over agricultural land to business are but a few indications of another of the stated characteristics that point out that politicians are indeed afflicted with ADD.

The good thing is that ADD in politicians is not an incurable affliction nor does it need chemicals to deal with it. All we have to do is vote in better politicians in 2009.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

good one sam! thank god its curable...

Anonymous said...

I enjoyed reading this.

~ Harneet

Rajesh said...

The politicians are a reflection of the polity. I think the politician bashing has beome the favourite pass time of the average citizen in the democracy. The role of the poltician varies from the devil to a joker in those tea time tet-a-tetes.

Your diagnosis of ADD makes them look like pawns in the hands of some higher design but from what i've seen they are astute individuals who knows that power is what runs a democracy and tries to get to it.

Hats off to those people who take tremendous efforts in getting to power and influencing it.

Its the average citizen of this country who suffers from ADD,and the society suffers fom collective amnesia.

Its only when we get cured of this will the politics and the politicians change.

smeedha said...

if only things were as easy as voting for the 'right' politician...
that also lets us believe that we can sit back and relax since, "o man, there is no right politician!!"
tough decision for each individual...blame it on those guys or take blame or take blame and do something about it...and deciding what that something will be...aarrgghh

Anonymous said...

Rajesh, Smeedha - We are changing as a polity - some people are getting more involved than others, the fact that candidates have to disclose their assets makes them a little bit more accountable. The problem is that we wait for an election to put them in their places. Why not before that - why cant we shame them when they do not do their work
- When they put animals to shame in the parliament

To date political parties have slapped each other. The citizens have never done that - maybe we should.

Those who love power also fear its loss.

Rajesh said...

that 'something' in my opinion should start from the understanding of political ideologies of the polititcal parties that are vying to represent us.Its not the right politician but the right political party that need to be voted in.

The other suggestion is the mobilisation of public opinions on issues that matter.

I'm so happy to live in a country where we have the right and space to mobilise people.

Thats what we should do.

Anonymous said...

I thought the Communists were an answer to BJP and Congress but the events in Nandigram proved otherwise.

Frankly there is no party that can claim to be 'clean'

smeedha said...

just as there is no "right" politician, i do not think there is any "right" party. i mean the only ones left are right but thats not who we want now is it?

i agree its a great feeling to know we can mobilise people, unfortunately, they can too and on the pull of money, power and the opium of mob mentality...

small victories is all we can manage, if at all

Rajesh said...

The right political ideology is what an individual can align himself/herself with.Every political party has its ideology,there are paradigms that the party believes in.So its up to the individual to decide which is the right political ideology and the party for him/her.
You cannot generalise and paint them all with the same brush.
political movements/ parties have their ears pressed on the ground to sense the vibes.They will resist changes but if they understand that it is the wave, they then internalise it.The best example being the raising of the dalit/OBC movements in the country.Be it right wing nationalists or the social democrats, every one came forward and internalised these movements.These movements thus changed the fate of millions in this country which is no small victory.
Its true that not every civil movement in the country creates a political change but there are defenitly many which could not be resisted by the political parties the RTI movement,the repealing of SEZs in Goa,the changes brought about in the AFSPA in Manipur are all examples in the recent past.

Even Nandigram[with all its political strings pulled in the background] is an example of civil movements victory.

Ultimately it is the people in this country who decides the fate of the country.Untill you capture their imagination nothing will change.If we want to see this world to run on our terms we will have to work towards it and not sit and crib about what the people in power are doing.

firdaus said...

i wish you'd done it with "Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder" ADHD- what the disorder actually is, and nevermind the americans and thier ideas. it would have been so hilarious! im not criticising the article. just wished it had included the hyperactivity of our netas

Anonymous said...

enjoyed reading about politicians,wish they could read the blog

Anonymous said...

Interesting to know.